Anything that has Utah being with California should be ignored. Mormons would take every opportunity to make the State of Deseret if they could. California splitting in half would make sense but along the State of Jefferson lines is more likely to me.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (3 children)

People making these maps truly have no understanding of half of the states' politics. There is no way Nazi Idaho is going to go with Canada, California, or Minnesota. They would literally fight to the last enslaved child soldier rather than let either of those possibilities happen. They're going with Utah to make Deseret. Illinois is never gonna vibe with TX or PA, they're even more likely to tie in with Minnesota than Colorado is. Michigan's two peninsulas will absolutely end up separated, the only things unifying them are the bottle tax and pot. Pennsylvania is way more likely to split into three parts than it is to split in two.

Breaking stuff down by state or even county is nonsensical. Urban/rural divides, cultural divisions and geographical boundaries are far more likely to factor in, and exactly zero US balkanization maps factor these things in.

Am I gonna have to do this myself?

[–] bananon@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

Tbf he says at the bottom

IS THIS LIKELY TO BE ACCURATE? Probably not, but it's precise, and if Nate Silver has taught us anything, it's that precision matters more than accuracy.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (11 replies)

load more comments (21 replies)