this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
111 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

jesus-christ

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Whatd Kubrick do to the adaptation?

[–] alcoholicorn@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

From what I understand, while the book is told from the perspective of the pedophile, who is proven to be lying or wildly distorting things in a brief moment when the victim gets to speak, the movie mostly plays it straight, with the child seducing a grown-ass man.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

Someone else got to it first. The movie is where the heart shaped sunglasses and lollypop imagery came from and absolutely sexualizes a child.