this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2024
4 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

42 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think one of the points - and strengths - of the Fediverse is that a single person or instance can’t make that choice for others.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Most lemmy instances defederated that Facebook BS factory right after it was announced.

True, a single person cant, but everyone agrees that Facebook can go fuck itself and that it ain't getting the stuff from us.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So - counter-example. I'm working with a UK organisation that currently still uses Twitter. I'm trying to persuade them to start their own Mastodon instance instead. Being able to reach Threads users, in addition to Masto uses would clearly be substantial selling point of setting up a Mastodon server - given the size of the Threads userbase - and much preferable to them starting a Threads account.

[–] CJOtheReal@ani.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

How so? It's a direct benefit of federation