British Columbia

1834 readers

57 users here now

!britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca

News, highlights and more relating to this great province!

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

TruckBC@lemmy.ca

LimpRimble@lemmy.ca

Between-tenant rent controls focus of new demands from major BC union (dailyhive.com)

submitted 2 years ago by breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca to c/britishcolumbia@lemmy.ca

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A major Metro Vancouver union has issued a call for tighter rent controls in the province, something it says is necessary for workers to be able to live within a reasonable distance of their workplace.

The BC General Employees Union wants the provincial government to limit how much a landlord can increase rent for a unit when one tenant leaves and another moves in.

Currently, BC only has rent controls for continuing tenancies — but as high interest rates make mortgages skyrocket, more tenants say they’re being served landlord-use evictions that force them into the red-hot rental market.

Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Could major unions hypothetically create a housing co-op fund that would initially be funded by an optional "fee", then later sustained by rent? That would incentivize people to join such unions, the unions would be able to use their large network of members (which requires zero effort to join) to quickly raise funds (smaller unions could pool with each other). That can be used to build affordable housing, which would have otherwise been built by for-profit corporations.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There's two big problems with this.

A) The amount of money required is staggering, on the order of 500-1000k per unit.. Which is exactly what people already can't afford. People who already have houses wouldn't pay the fee, and people who are renting can't the fee that would be required at those prices.

This is the primary reason why government isn't building even hundreds of thousands of units in BC, they quite literally can't afford it.

B) Essentially, you need to buy/build houses at current market rates, which doesn't save you anything now for renters. All it does is control the price in the future by removing the benefit to the landlord from the cost equation. It only helps 10+ years down the road when prices have gone up even further and those properties could be kept nearer to the original prices than the new market price.

[–] Poutinetown@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would it take 1M per unit for a new development? Is it due to the high cost of labor in BC?

[–] SamuelRJankis@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

My 2010 strata building in Vancouver is insured for $127mill. It's about 300 unit, multi tower high rise and 50/50 split of 1&2 bedrooms mostly. So about 433k each.

There still a lot of other details along with the land probably being similar price. But overall 100 million or even 1 billion doesn't really buy a lot of house these days even on larger scales.