this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024
90 points (98.9% liked)

News

37007 readers
1678 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Boeing jetliner that suffered an inflight blowout over Oregon was not being used for flights to Hawaii after a warning light that could have indicated a pressurization problem lit up on three different flights, a federal official said Sunday.

Alaska Airlines decided to restrict the aircraft from long flights over water so the plane “could return very quickly to an airport” if the warning light reappeared, said Jennifer Homendy, chair of the National Transportation Safety Board.

Homendy cautioned that the pressurization light might be unrelated to Friday’s incident in which a plug covering an unused exit door blew off the Boeing 737 Max 9 as it cruised about three miles (4.8 kilometers) over Oregon.

The warning light came on during three previous flights: on Dec. 7, Jan. 3 and Jan. 4 — the day before the door plug broke off. Homendy said she didn’t have all the details regarding the Dec. 7 incident but specified the light came on during a flight on Jan. 3 and on Jan. 4 after the plane had landed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There isn’t enough detail in the article to know what they mean by “pressurization” warning…is it overpressure? Underpressure? There’s a lot of things that could trigger a warning.

I seem to remember reading some planes had monitoring for basically how much makeup air was being put in to keep pressure (which tells you how much leakage there is). If I had to bet, I'd say it's that.

I say this as someone who is interested in aviation but has no formal education in it.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I've flown multiple types of aircraft and do not recall ever having a "high flow" warning on any of them regarding pressurization leaking out, though I will readily admit that I could have forgotten or that it may exist on certain aircraft types. I'll assume the 737 operates like another Boeing I have flown and such a warning doesn't exist. You'll have overpressure warnings and cabin altitude too high (unable to pressurize properly) warnings, but I can almost guarantee that if a door were leaking sufficiently to vent pressurization enough to cause a high cabin altitude warning you would absolutely hear a significant noise coming from the door. Flight attendants are often pretty sharp on aircraft they work on frequently, and any such significant noise would be brought to the attention of the cockpit crew and maintenance. One would hope that such a noise was not present and ignored.

Regarding my musings on over/under pressure...my point was that we don't know what the system warning was and it could be completely unrelated to the door failing or the integrity of the pressure vessel.