this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22717 readers
1 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
quartz242@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
blashork@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
15
If not for Hinkle and them leading them where they are, where would most patsocs be politically? (See body please) (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by autismdragon@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Like my core question here is, are the majority of patsocs MLs lead astray into social reaction? And without the patsoc grift theyd be good MLs?

Or are they fash at heart who are doing faux-leftism because it was suggested to them?

Or would it be something else?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nope im going to figure this puzzle out.

Eta: also i made a post about one that annoyed me in the dunk tank and then asked a question about them that i think is interesting. Thats not really as obsessive as youre painting it