this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
23
Virtual influencers are burning up South Koreans’ Instagram feeds (www.economist.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by FuckyWucky@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I'm not completely against AI but this shit makes me wish we went back to monke.

She is perhaps best-known for an advert for an insurance company in which she danced across the rooftops of Seoul.

We really are living in a ~~Cyberpunk~~ dystopia

Apart from being cheaper, virtual celebrities have other advantages over human ones. “They don’t complain” and firms “don’t have to worry about them ruining their reputation”, says Kim Sang-kyun from Kangwon National University in Gangwon province.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] professionalduster@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

these virtual influences vtubers etc are the logical conclusion of what that role is anyway. exceedingly fake and plastic, a spectacle for people to gawk at. who cares if it's literally virtual from front to back, 'real' influences or streamers are performing a role anyway, they can't be their true selves, nothing about any of what they do is real or meaningful

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yea, human influencers were already extremely fake af.