this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
694 points (96.6% liked)

News

36942 readers
3186 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

About 700,000 adults between ages 26 and 49 will be eligible as of Jan. 1

California will welcome the new year by becoming the first state to offer health insurance for all undocumented immigrants.

Starting Jan. 1, all undocumented immigrants, regardless of age, will qualify for Medi-Cal, California's version of the federal Medicaid program for people with low incomes.

Previously, undocumented immigrants were not qualified to receive comprehensive health insurance but were allowed to receive emergency and pregnancy-related services under Medi-Cal as long as they met eligibility requirements, including income limits and California residency in 2014.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

California has a huge labor shortage. It is extraordinarily expensive to live near any major population center. Agriculture is a huge industry, but many service, hospitality industries, etc. still need and require people living near big areas where the average housing price is 500k+ (this is including 1-2 commute to achieve that price excluding our high gasoline costs)

Who the fuck can sustainably work at or near minimum wage with those costs, paying full taxes.

This is an attempt at a labor policy that keeps all tech people happy they get can go out to dinner on Tuesday night.

[–] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

In Canada we have similar issues in they want to bring in immigrants (many on student visas) by 100s of thousands which in turn sees them blamed for the housing affordability crisis when they really are brought in to help prop up not only the universities with higher enrollment fees but also to prop up employers that want workers at minimum or lower wages. It's an added bonus that they need to rent rooms from politician landlords.

There's definitely an issue with the impending shortage of younger population to support the aging population which is also why they're bringing immigrants in for, but it's also maintaining artificially low wages that normal market conditions would not ever see filled unless wages were increased.

In the meantime like in the US there is this low wage economic class of non citizens abused for cheap labor.

[–] ArtificialLink@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you are the only one who even got close to answering my question. Without just straight up attacking one point i made and then ignoring everything else i said.

This makes sense. And with how our gov revolves around work and corporate greed it would make even more then that California gov is trying to bolster its "low earners" economy.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Because a healthier population is a more able-working population. Great perspective

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have the tried building more housing?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Where? We don't own 2/3 of the land in the state. The Federal Government does, and we can't build there. We've built as much as we can, given maximum height restrictions, and used up basically all available land already.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I lived in the Bay area and travel to California often for work. You are just wrong. First off there is plenty of room, secondly you people build single detached homes when you should be building subways with apartment buildings. Sure the fed owns a lot of your land but who cares? It isn't in San Jose it is out in the freaken desert. Also freaken combine like things. It is so absurd how you randomly see fortune 100 companies next to houses.

Basically fly to the better coast and walk around Brooklyn. Take some pictures. Then show the people back home what you should be doing. This isn't rocket science.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

We have to change the laws to be able to build like that. You aren't allowed to build taller than a certain height west of the 5. State and local maximum building heights do not allow us to build multiple use structures.

Sure there may be "plenty of room," but it's all owned, and zoned for single use structures. Believe me, I'm fighting to change that shit at the local level, but currently I couldn't replace my house with a brownstone because it will never get permitted, as in the permits needed for construction.

Also the fed owns land in the cities as well as the deserts, mountains, and forests.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

So you admit that this is a human caused problem