this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13473 readers
1 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I disagree broadly with the premise. I think it is helpful to engage in topics you know nothing about. But by engage I don't mean try to tear down or refute, I mean ask questions, and then listen to the answers. Engage by consuming and learning. Learning is good and we often learn from each other. Engagement is good as long as that engagement isn't robbing anyone of a voice but is instead amplifying that voice. Asking good faith questions and then listening to the answers is one way to do this.
This is good advice for most people but I already know everything about everything.
It's fine to engage, albeit
is flying very close to the sun of gish gallop bullshit questions that, really, you should just google.
I'd argue this site has the concept pretty down pat. I mean there's some good souls who'd write your truthful answer as to things like "Why is blackface racist but not whiteface" or similar questions but really the appropiate answer is: there's enough written on this topic that you could just read that.
I'm very much in favor of asking earnest questions.
I do like the idea of pointing people toward previous discussions that turned out to be very helpful. Certain topics tend to follow the same path, and reading through a good discussion can scratch an itch that books or essays can't quite reach.
But even if the exact same discussion is created from whole cloth over and over, it's not a wasted effort if the people involved come out of it thinking more clearly.