this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
664 points (94.5% liked)

Political Memes

9280 readers
1993 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] accideath@lemmy.world 37 points 2 years ago (12 children)

Fun fact: Modern science does not say that there are only two biological genders but that even on a biological level, there is a spectrum. For example, there are measurable differences between the brains of a woman and a transgender man and there are more viable chromosome combinations than XY and XX.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

Klinefelter syndrome with XXY is the most common of the non-standard combinations, but only account for about 1/1000 of male births. Combinatorics of sex chromosome aneuploidies such as XXX, XXY, XXXY and so on does only give a finite number of combinations.

I do not really see why this argument is brought up so often. Is it neccesary to speak of chromosmes to validate gender identity?

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Since most transphobes base their arguments primarily on a perceived biological binary, the argument needs to be brought up.

The psychological and sociological arguments around gender identity and expression sadly aren’t very fruitful when the people you’re trying to convince fixate on biology knowledge that has been refuted for decades.

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay, I see. I am not from the US, which might be guessed from my misspelling of "necessary" above. I am sorry you have to deal with those people, but for what it is worth they are not so abundant here (in my experience at least).

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m not from the US either, have met my fair share of idiots both on- and offline though…

[–] Urist@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did not mean to make an assumption about you, merely say that the culture war waged by reactionaries is foreign to me.

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

No worries. I’m luckily also mostly spared from personal confrontations with assholes in my country

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)