this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
783 points (82.8% liked)

Fediverse

35920 readers
346 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it's pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pxtl@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago (22 children)

This is like saying "my email provider should block all emails from Gmail".

And they can hoover your data right now. Like, you think bots aren't spidering the site already? It's a public website.

[–] ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

That's entirely different. As an individual, I have the choice to send emails to, or block emails from, Gmail.com.

But on Lemmy, if I am on an instance that federates with Threads, and I don't want Threads.net to get a copy of my content or posts (or have my content or posts show up on Threads.net in the future), then tough shit for me, my only option is to either go silent or move to an instance that has defederated from Threads.

People keep making the email argument, but it is not the same thing at all. I don't think it's fair for a large percentage of lemmy.world's users to not have a voice in a decision that will absolutely impact them, nor is it fair to have a stance of "then leave then."

[–] kpw@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

If a user blocks a domain I suppose their content isn't send to that server anymore I hope?

[–] ubergeek77@lemmy.ubergeek77.chat 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It is. The user just won't see any content from the server they blocked.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

They won't see any communities from the server they block. Users are not blocked in domain blocking.

Users can now block instances. Similar to community blocks, it means that any posts from communities which are hosted on that instance are hidden. However the block doesn’t affect users from the blocked instance, their posts and comments can still be seen normally in other communities.

[–] kpw@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

How do you know? We should fix this on the software level.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)