this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
183 points (98.9% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 59 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Ugh lemme guess, he thinks wealth comes from “Innovation” or some similar fairy tale.

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm certain he thinks that.

Imagine somebody replied to him with this link to a Wikipedia section and they gave him a ~200 word baby brain summary so he doesn't have to strain his baby noggin with big words and context and too much information.

1954 Guatemalan coup d'état

United Fruit Company lobbying

He couldn't understand. There's no way to get him to understand.

How can a fruit company be powerful? They just sell fruit!

He can't fathom that countries like the US historically and still routinely bully weaker countries and powerful entities allied with US interests benefit greatly. Sometimes it's fruit and other times it might even literally be "digging up minerals".

[–] buckykat@hexbear.net 47 points 2 years ago (3 children)

actually sweaty bananas aren't a mineral so i'm right maybe-later-kiddo

[–] barrbaric@hexbear.net 33 points 2 years ago

Back to the banana mines with you

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 27 points 2 years ago

Drat. It's too late now but I all I need to do was mention two words "conflict minerals".

[–] Galli@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

aktshually bananas contain minerals such as potassium. I have pwned you with facts and logic expert-shapiro

[–] GrouchyGrouse@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago

Good for preventing muscle cramps.

[–] Gosplan14_the_Third@hexbear.net 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Libs, 15 years ago - "Yeah, neo-colonialism is bad. But hey, what can you do? Vote with your wallet."

Libs today - "Neo-Colonialism is based actually."

[–] DrCrustacean@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Libs today don't think neocolonialism exists, that's kinda OOP's whole deal (although it'd be easy to miss as the only defense of this idea he gives us "it's dumb if you think it's real"). They think colonialism was bad but the Good Guys in the West ended it a hundred or so years ago and now the third world is poor because they have bad ideas/governments.

You have to remember that liberals are idealists. As in, they believe that material conditions are caused by ideology. The West has better ideas and better systems of governance, so it's more prosperous. They can't believe that wealth in the imperial core comes from extraction in the global south because that means that the liberal ideology stems from the material conditions of global dominance and hegemony and not the other way around.

"Neo-Colonialism is based" is what they'll be saying after they've been scratched

[–] borlax@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

Innovation that uses minerals and rare earth metals, i.e. computers and other electronics.

These people legitimately think that we are pulling innovation out of thin air without resources to support it.