this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2023
35 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FumpyAer@hexbear.net 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

no this makes perfect sense. see MLs have to agree and have hegemony of thought. Otherwise their whole plans fall apart. They can't disagree with each other. So they literally can't conceptualize dissent and internal critique as being positive. They are ideologues whose whole plan doesn't work if thye all don't have the same belifs. This would look like a war to them bc their ideal is everyone following the party line 100% of the time. And its a sign of failure if that doesn't happen.

Have they never seen us have a struggle session? Lmao

[–] Ram_The_Manparts@hexbear.net 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only way a political movement can work is by making sure that literally no one agrees on what needs to be done.

Obviously.

[–] theposterformerlyknownasgood@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Okay but that was quite literally the bolsheviks. Not a single member of the bolshevik leadership agreed on literally anything before Lenin died

[–] silent_water@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago

diversity of thought, unity of action

[–] BeamBrain@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is someone trying to describe democratic centralism ten years after half-paying attention to someone briefly explaining it