this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
39 points (91.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
2 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] SnuggleSnail@ani.social 0 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I am against the burning of books disguised as freedom of speech.

  1. It is bad for the environment. Too much co2 production in the process. If you must destroy books, recycle them!

  2. The Nazis did this very popularly. I always get reminded of that, when people burn books.

  3. I feel it is a very marginal impact into freedom of speech. I can not remember a single occasion where I had to burn a book to be able to articulate my thoughts.

  4. I think most countries ban burning houses, even if it is infringing the freedom of speech. Why should it be different with books?

[โ€“] Apollo2323@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Houses are not a medium to spread information. A book is , it means something so it is speech. Just like burning the US flag is allow because the first amendment allow us to judge and say fuck to our government.

[โ€“] tryptaminev@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

in the US it is allowed. In many countries it is not alloeed to burn flags in public.

But in the US it also counts as free speech to bribe politicians and disrupt funerals for gay soldiers KIA so i am not sure the US has the best approach to free speech.

load more comments (5 replies)