this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
115 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

73602 readers
3072 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee -5 points 2 years ago (22 children)

Nuclear fanbois hate this one simple trick

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (21 children)

It uses a ton of material to power 73 homes annually (652 feet high and 45 feet in diameter), works best in a desert but requires a lot of water. Yeah, nuclear energy is really threatened by that. Modern microreactors in development make, for example, 1.5 MWe at let's say 90% capacity factor. Assuming about 1000 kWh/mo for a house, that microreactor, which can fit on the back of a semi truck and be transported down the highway that way, can power 985 homes anually and doesn't require cooling water (will require water for electrical steam generation).

Yeah, I will stick with nuclear, thanks.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Nuclear energy isn't threatened by this. It's threatened by the fact that it's impossible to build one at a profit.

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's why factory fabricated microreactors are such a cool concept!

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And by the time that concept becomes reality we'll either be running 100% renewable energy or dead from climate change

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nope. Deployment of factory fabricated microreactors is planned for the 2030s.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah, plans! Well then, that's a guarantee! No way they'll hit unexpected roadblocks and go massively overbudget like every other nuclear project

[–] CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You should educate yourself about GenIV reactors (designs, supply chains, costs...) before you embarrass yourself.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I don't need to add to the embarrassment that is the nuclear industry

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The cost of electricity from those is even more expensive than from conventional nuclear.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)