this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I was talking to a schoolteacher the other day who was getting re-fingerprinted for the Nth time. Their last fingerprinting was two years ago. Same job, same county, etc. Everyone was justifying it because of "privacy." But, like, it's all going to the same database, where the same people have access. Are they destroying the records every two years (doubt ), or did the authorities just forget their own passwords?

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (5 children)

If you get into the reaaaaaaaaaaaal nitty gritty of security regarding biometric factors shit turns real weird eventually. Like "How do we know that fingerprint is still attached to a living person?" type stuff.

I'd be sure as hell this isn't what happened here, just sort of a fun fact. Also why I think thinking biometric factors as safe is fucking insane, exactly because they're fairly immuteable. You get one data leak on your fingerprint-security-database and now you can never use that shit again if you're taking it seriously. And if you don't expect nation-state-level actors as a threat vector, why the fuck are you taking fingerprints?

It's mostly just technologically illiterate people falling for it imo

[–] NewAcctWhoDis@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A fingerprint is a convenient way to unlock my laptop and can't be leaked by a security camera.

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

It's also a great way to get your fingerprints nicked by whoever kind of just wants 'em

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)