this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
432 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

73967 readers
5349 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (14 children)

Sorry, but that's completely wrong. There has been a lot of research into quantum algorithms, and we have many examples besides Shor's algorithm, for example: https://www.amarchenkova.com/posts/5-quantum-algorithms-that-could-change-the-world

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

I am a physicist and truly appreciate the effect of quantum computing on our simulations, but with "real world" I meant proper industrial use. And for that, there are hardly any algorithms known except Shor's. When the CEO of Deutsche Bank says he will do his bank transactions on a quantum computer, you know the topic is over-hyped.

Edit: A video that explains this by a theoretical physicist working on the foundations of quantum mechanics

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (11 children)

I understand that you can't just translate random algorithms to quantum computers and expect them to run better - but I did link an overview of 5 quantum algorithms that have real world uses, and Shor's is only one of them.

I don't consider Sabine Hossenfelder a person worth listening to. She frequently comments on topics she doesn't know much about/has a very biased view of (e.g. her transphobic video).

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you talking about her video on trans athletes? I don't remember it being transphobic.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm talking about her video on transitions in general, not sure if you're referring to that or something else. She misrepresented the state of research (implying there's less research concluding transitions to be a good thing than there really is) and shared misinformation.

[–] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I don't think I was talking about this, interesting. Because in the video I mentioned she was fine with trans athletes competing together with cis athletes, which seemed very progressive to me. But I'm happy to be proven wrong.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I was talking about "Is being trans a social fad among teenagers?".

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)