Technology

78029 readers

3027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

272

Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised | A West Virginia judge largely denied Amazon's motion to dismiss lawsuit (arstechnica.com)

submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Judge: Amazon “cannot claim shock” that bathroom spycams were used as advertised | A West Virginia judge largely denied Amazon's motion to dismiss lawsuit::A West Virginia judge largely denied Amazon's motion to dismiss lawsuit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Amazon's Product Safety Team specifically inspected the camera

Could somebody please explain what this even means?

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Real human employees saw the existence of the product. And did nothing.

[–] soggy_kitty@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They inspected the listing of the product by reading the characters of the primary key of the product. Inspection at it's finest