this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22717 readers
1 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a comparatively new tradition of "New Year's language challenges", wherein I try to change the way I speak or write in some way for the duration of the coming year. The challenges I've thought of for 2024 are:

  • Using he, she, and xe instead of it when referring to a definite inanimate thing.
  • Using hissen, hersen, theirsen(s), itsen, etc. as optional proximate forms of personal pronouns.

So basically, "the colorful flower, though it is fragrant" becomes "the colorful flower, though hissen is fragrant". Fun stuff!

So my question is essentially whether it's a good idea for the hissen/hersen challenge to apply to real people. Do you think it would be disrespectful to someone's preferred pronouns to add another inflection to them? I don't think so, but I want to check with others to make sure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Llituro@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People will be very confused constantly if you do your own version of English to them. Anthropomorphizing the inanimate seems fine though.

[โ€“] Erika3sis@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

People will be very confused constantly if you do you[...]

So, what's changed, exactly? :P