this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
55 points (86.7% liked)
World News
32285 readers
1 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No explanation in the article about why they "have to be killed before their wool can be removed." Wikipedia only says, "As undomesticated wild animals, the chirus cannot be shorn, so they are killed for this purpose."
I have to think that there is a way to harvest the wool without killing the animals, but that the people who want to harvest the wool don't have the resources to do it.
Himalayas makes me think cold. So maybe they freeze to death if you release them naked like that? If you keep them around until it regrows, well that's domestication.
The solution here would be to just domesticate them.
Shouldn't take more than a few thousand years
You can actually do it on a much shorter time scale, depending on the species in question. A Soviet scientist in the 50s started it with foxes and had noticeable results by the 4th generation, less than 2 decades later.
The real catch here is in the semantics, defining your terms and expectations. How much genetic drift you're aiming for, and what traits you select, what results are functionally "good enough", etc...
In this example, we probably don't need fully domesticated animals, some tamed generations should be good enough.
But foxes are canines and have a great record, thanks to those fox experiments, of being rapidly domesticated. But canines have lots of pups quickly. Sheep are so much slower on that front which dramatically increases the length between generations. Even "domestic" rams with thousands of years of breeding are still barely "tame".