this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
556 points (99.8% liked)

196

18204 readers
1133 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 years ago (7 children)

While this claim might turn out to be false, the amount of vitriol hurled towards Peta really is something else.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 42 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Even if you've never heard of any of the other terrible shit they've done, you have a live example of outrageous ableism from them, and you still jump to their defence (from 2 people who basically said "fuck peta" on the internet E: not even, they basically said "peta aren't trustworthy" which is demonstrable fact)?

We (because fuck peta) are not the fucking problem here..

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 years ago

Because Peta engaged in ableism & Pseudoscience that later inspired the anti vaccine movement.

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 25 points 2 years ago

A) Exploiting and fuelling fear of a vulnerable group is evil.

B) They don't get the benefit of "may turn out to be false". They get to start at "fuck these bullshit lies".

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'm vegan for a decade now and for a while I felt like I have to support peta because they fight for the right cause. But seeing all the shit they publish, I'm not that sure anymore

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

I guess PETA are useful for making regular vegans seem extremely tolerant and reasonable.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you have examples? I've been under the impression that they're the good guys in most cases

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

You can just look at this post and see how they try to scare people into not drinking cows milk through fear of autism, which is some ablest bullshit. This is literally no better than anti-vax rhetoric.

[–] Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 years ago

This inspired the anti Vax movement.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean, not trying to defend this as this is pretty bad, but I guess it gets people talking and thinking about their consumption of animal products?

[–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, it doesn't. It makes people discount anything you say because all you're trying to do is draw attention to yourself. You end up being ignored and nobody cares about your message since the things you say are terrible.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Autism is not a bad thing, but they are acting as if it is.

How would you feel if the campaign said: "Drinking milk makes your child gay?"

Would it still be okay because it gets people thinking about their consumption of animal products?

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

I see what you mean

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I remember a cat adaptation campaign with the slogan "Grab them by the pussy" right after Trump said it (or when it came out) which is tasteless at best

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is pretty tasteless, I'll give you that. But it's meant to be provocative, I think, and shocking, so the slogan did accomplish its goal.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes, they accomplish their goals, but (to come back to my first comment) is it really the right cause or does it alienate people?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Do they accomplish their goals? How many people can you point to who have said that they became a vegan because of PETA?

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

That's my point. Their goal is provocation, the right cause would be to convince people which they don't do

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Not just one dog. They do it systematically

[–] x4740N@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Because this would absolutely be in character for them, that's why.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The people who want us to give up all meat and even not have pets operate the biggest kill-shelter in the United States. They're constantly preachy, condescending, they lie. Fuck em.

[–] v4ld1z@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Euthanising animals that have nothing to live for any longer, who are dead-sick and are in agony. Compared to the billions of animals raised for animal ag, slaughtered on the daily, just to be sold for pennies in stores. I don't think they're the villain here, my guy.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago

Miss me with the "my guy" shit. It's smarmy.

The post we're commenting on they're saying milk causes autism, like out of their ass. Just like they did with vaccines. You say they aren't the villain, but making shit up about people with medical conditions doesn't make you a hero.