this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2023
62 points (94.3% liked)

Futurology

3188 readers
8 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
voidx@futurology.today
Lugh@futurology.today
Espiritdescali@futurology.today
AwesomeLowlander@futurology.today
62
Research shows people rate AI-generated content as better than human content, until they find out it's AI-generated. (www.cambridge.org)
submitted 2 years ago by Lugh@futurology.today to c/futurology@futurology.today
32 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sure, but the person I'm responding to literally described AI art generators as "internet-searching AI" and that's a common misconception of how they work. Even among people who confidently claim to know how these things work.

[–] dumdum666@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah - didn’t read his first comment… CompSci Major…

Sorry…

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's okay, there are a lot of misconceptions out there and what you said was also informative and true. So hopefully it all helps.