this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15897 readers
1 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Dronies just can't stop

https://lemm.ee/post/9279694

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

pretending to not understand

Socrates, famously a real toxic asshole who spent most of his time pretending to not understand

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is such a terminally-online debatebro tactic too, making this accusation.

People like Jordan Peterson and his fans will refuse make clear statements because they rely upon vague allusions (and dogwhistles, of course) so they can play at motte-and-bailey tactics; if you respond to their poor attempt at making a point they'll object because it wasn't "what they meant" but the moment you ask them to be more explicit about their statements they'll treat you like you are being a troll and that you're sealioning them.

[–] Tofu_Lewis@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

Exactly. The Audit podcast's takedown of PragerU really emphasizes how factual imprecision and "fuzzy" statements are an absolutely essential and insincere tool used to preempt any counterargument with "I didn't actually say that."

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Which, again, is why you should appeal to the stick early and often.

[–] MemesAreTheory@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

cure-for-fascism it sure is appealing, isn't it?

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago

People like Jordan Peterson and his fans will refuse make clear statements because they rely upon vague allusions (and dogwhistles, of course) so they can play at motte-and-bailey tactics

Yesterday, I saw that with the "all governments do atrocities, actually" debate douche who refused to clarify, up or down, what that statement is supposed to imply except liberal nodding toward its vague wisdom.