this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
81 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
81
Calling for a ceasefire in Israel/Palestine is a liberal position. The radical position is to call for supporting the Palestinian resistance until there is an end to Israeli apartheid. (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by HexbearGPT@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Fuck a ceasefire, END APARTHEID!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even the Japanese in WW2 were convinced to stop in the face of overwhelming violence when, before, they had elements in power saying they'd rather be exterminated than give up.

I heard they actually were just insisting the soviets be at the treaty negotiations so they didn't have to negotiate two peaces

[โ€“] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

I'm ready to believe that. A source would still be nice.

I would also put forward that overwhelming force, even without an atomic bomb, was enough to convince people who beforehand would have preferred that the island be exterminated.