this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
688 points (97.3% liked)

News

31568 readers
3263 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 435 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I don't feel bad for the guy, but I don't celebrate this sort of vigilante justice, either. Prisoners should be safe from other prisoners. Prison is not meant to be torture, and recidivism is a massive problem in the United States. Chauvin will have 20 years to contemplate his crimes, and treating him and every other prisoner will only reinforce their criminal proclivities.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 231 points 2 years ago (2 children)

American prisons ARE meant for torture. Don't get it twisted.

If they were for rehabilitation or treatment, then we would see to that, societally. But we don't.

This is a small piece of why our justice system is so absolutely fucked.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 92 points 2 years ago (8 children)

American prisons ARE meant for torture. Don’t get it twisted.

naw. not really. Prisons are meant to provide cheap domestic labor to the corporations running them. it's all profits.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 88 points 2 years ago

Well both those things can be true.

[–] Poggervania@kbin.social 47 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Never forget, it’s actually legal to enslave prisoners according to the 13th Amendment.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

yup. And there is a reason why laws are written to disproportionately affect certain groups- like how crack cocaine gets more jail time than powder, or marijuana convictions...

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That's a part of it, yes. It's the slavery loophole in the 13th amendment.

[–] superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Less of a loophole, more of an intended feature

[–] Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Loopholes are things intentionally built into structures with the purpose of allowing something through. I find it weird so many people think loopholes aren't something intentional.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 years ago

The torture is just a fringe benefit in the cops' eyes.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

FWIW the vast majority of prisons in the US are not corporate run (>90%), but those majority government-run prisons still provide a lot of free/cheap manufacturing labor to private companies.

The government itself is to blame, not just private prisons.

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

Cheap domestic labor isn't torture?

[–] commanderbalok@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

13th amendment

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

i think you’re responding to a normative statement by making a descriptive statement.

for those unaware, here’s a quick explanation from wikipedia: a normative statement is “meant to talk about the world as it should be”, while a descriptive statement is “meant to describe the world as it is”.

[–] magikmw@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

If we could read we would be very upset.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lemmy cannot read one word of your comment

[–] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

the most niche grammar nazi

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Very glad this is currently the top comment. I was worried I’d run into a comment thread cheering for violence that simply shouldn’t have happened.

[–] Orbituary@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

The idea of "not killing" and "I wish he was dead" can't seem live in most people's head. I think he's human waste, he should be dead, and I wouldn't have lamented his death. BUT!!! I don't want him to die and I don't want someone to kill him.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

Yeah dude is a piece of shit, but it's a bit disheartening seeing people cheer on stuff like this.

[–] seathru@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

but I don’t celebrate this sort of vigilante justice, either

We don't know what happened. He might have ran his mouth and found out he wasn't a protected class anymore.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That doesn't really change anything.

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does a little bit, I think.

Yes, our prisons should be safe for those who are confined within them. I agree with that, and that less people should be confined in the first place.

But there is a qualitative difference between "he was stabbed due to being a cop (or due to being THAT cop)" vs "He got into an altercation that resulted in him being stabbed, but which could have happened to anyone."

I think the kneejerk assumption is that he was targeted, which is worse IMO.

Not that I shed a single tear for the fate of Derek Chauvin, mind you.

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How is "that could've happened to anyone" any better?

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Would you rather be in an unsafe environment where you are taking the same risks as anyone else by being there, or an unsafe environment where you are likely to be specifically and personally targeted for being you?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You'll have to ask someone who said either was acceptable.

[–] catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

I agree with your broad sentiment that prisoners should feel safe in prison. However, this specific instance, I call (delayed) karma.