Chicago Bears

2 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@nfl.community

What was the consensus on the Eberflus hire when it first happened? (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by dtemp2022@alien.top to c/bears@nfl.community

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I’ll be honest, I didn’t even know who Matt Eberflus was before the Bears hired him. I then saw the notification and didn’t really know what to think, but seeing that we hired a defensive minded guy for (at the time) a QB going into his second season had me confused.

I thought maybe it would work because anything was better than Nagy (at that point lol), but here we are today. I think a lot of fans didn’t like the hire at first and still don’t like it obviously.

Who did the Bears pass up on/who is someone they could’ve had if they didn’t hire Eberflus?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] mnemonikos82@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

There's no such thing as consensus in the NFL. The media money machine is built on the concept of disagreement as entertainment.

That being said, he was billed as all the good stuff Lovie did (Tampa 2, HITS, etc.) while being modern and capable of producing a modernized team that could compete. And that's why trying to recreate the past is just never a good idea.