this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
461 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
83500 readers
3167 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
This is why I use Linux, the fingerprint device wouldn't be supported so this wouldn't be an issue /s
Mmm yes security by non-functionality. A pillar of the modern cybersecurity framework.
Can't hack a brick 🤷
But you can use a brick to hack windows.
Something something Soviet Russia..
When you could have said crack, but instead said hack.
yes indeed, the good ol' broken windows fallacy!
And this is why I am typing this on a 1921 Royal No. 10 typewriter.
Found Tom Hanks's Lemmy account.
Works for my webcam. Tbh I'd like someone to hack it, would mean they would've written drivers for it
It is called zero trust, killing functionalities is zscaler core business
The fun thing about Linux is your realize physical control is ownership. You can just throw a Bootable Linux image with some utilities and remove the password from a Windows account in a second. If you really need to keep something safe, it has to be encrypted.
Regardless, you can just read what's on the disk anyway, so you don't need to be able to log in.
Unless bitlocker is enabled by default, which is becoming more and more common unfortunately...
The one on my Thinkpad works just fine :)
I got a T80s and the sensor doesn't work. It's an 8th gen Intel machine, that's like four or five generations behind.
I've got a T440p and I just set it up through the menu in the KDE settings, it worked right out of the box.
Mine's not in libfprint, libfprint-tod, or libfprint-goodix. Running GNOME because I heard fprintd was easier to implement instead of KDE, which is usually my pref DE.
Nah I use fprint on my arch laptop so there is fingerprint login technology. Hopefully that doesn't have security vulnerabilities.
It has vulnerabilities for sure. But they haven’t been found because no one cares about hacking you or the 1 other person on earth that use Arch and fingerprint security.
Security by obscurity lol
Today I was fucking around with this shit. I can't even update my distro, otherwise ecryptfs will go adios, and fingerprinting will be broken.
Correct answer.
Using any form of biometric 'login' under the US's "justice" system is supremely ill-advised.
One of the major reasons I gave up on trying to run Linux on my laptop was lack of fingerprint reader support.
So YES, from someone who was asked to do fingerprint authentication in a sensitive environment (and had to refuse, even to the salespeople pested me)
You can choose not to use it even if Linux supports it.
Then I really don't see how it's a plus. Smaller kernel size? lol
How is not having support for something a plus for you? I swear to god, some Linux users are so stuck up.
What TV did you get that doesn’t have smart features?
I looked, but all the ones I could find were 1080p, no HDR, and either tiny or made for commercial/industrial installation.
fingerprint login is not secure. period. Being stuck in using a password login is a plus
You could just disable fingerprint login, though.
"what, you dont want to use the new door lock made from soggy white bread? You deadbolt losers are so stuck up"
I have a Microsoft fingerprint reader that works fine on Linux lol