this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Chicago Bears
2 readers
1 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
TLDR - Bears use Panthers pick at #1 to take QB Caleb Williams, and then used their own #5 to trade down and select ED Dallas Turner.
Giants - QB Luke Maye
Cardinals - WR Marvin Harrison Jr.
Patriots - LT Olu Fashanu
Maybe it’s my bias as a Bama fan but I’d be happy with Turner if MHJ is gone.
Yes please
Thank you for posting.
I hate the Turner pick though.
Not that I don’t want to add d line help. But he is undersized and doesn’t have a lot of play “strength”.
The idea that the bears wouldn't draft a left tackle in the top 5 of the draft all because Braxton Jones is "entrenched" in the position might just be the dumbest sports thought I've read this year.
Can we stop tossing around “generational talent” and making these broad sweeping comparisons like the article does between Williams and Stroud. It’s been proven time and again that there’s no secret sauce. I would contend that the last “generational” QB taken #1 overall was Manning in 1999. (Luck probably had a trajectory and chance to make an argument before opting to retire early).
Sure there’s guys that have carved out solid careers as high level starters (Manning, Stafford, Vick, Smith, Palmer) but there’s just as many busts and journeymen.
On another note, if the Bears take Williams, great, but get a coaching staff that will build their scheme around him to support his development. If the plan is to hold onto the dud coaches we have now it doesn’t matter if we draft the second coming of Manning or Brady, they’ll flame out all the same.
Citing Caleb Williams playmaking/improvisational skills is asinine. Thats the same strength Justin has. Arguably even better. But none of that matters a got-dayum bit when the coaches don’t scheme around it.
When they say Caleb Williams would be less expensive, that would only be the case if Fields earned a big second contract. In which case, good deal! But the first pick in the 2024 draft will be more expensive than the 11th pick in the 2021 draft, the only draft where players got cheaper than the previous year. And if you assume they would BOTH be good enough to earn second contracts, then you also have to consider the second contract Caleb Williams would earn would be higher than Fields' second contract because of the time value of money.
The decision to draft a QB really should ONLY depend on whether you think the QB you are drafting will be better. This "clock resetting" argument that crops up sounds smart but is pretty dumb.
Citing Caleb Williams playmaking/improvisational skills is asinine. Thats the same strength Justin has. Arguably even better. But none of that matters a got-dayum bit when the coaches don’t scheme around it.
When they say Caleb Williams would be less expensive, that would only be the case if Fields earned a big second contract. In which case, good deal! But the first pick in the 2024 draft will be more expensive than the 11th pick in the 2021 draft, the only draft where players got cheaper than the previous year. And if you assume they would BOTH be good enough to earn second contracts, then you also have to consider the second contract Caleb Williams would earn would be higher than Fields' second contract because of the time value of money.
The decision to draft a QB really should ONLY depend on whether you think the QB you are drafting will be better. This "clock resetting" argument that crops up sounds smart but is pretty dumb.