this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023

113 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers

1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

itsPina@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

113

Uncle: "So you know that Evo guy from Bolivia? He pretended to be a communist but actually the economy did great under him. Weird thing" (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

88 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the fact he wasn't willing to follow laws implemented during HIS rule kinda tells you everything you need to know.

What if they were from before his time? Would that actually be better, or would you have a new way to characterize that it tells you all you need to know?

[–] Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

I'll give you that, it shouldn't matter when or under which president a law was implemented when evaluating its validity. The only thing that matters is whether a law has the backing of the population.