this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
20 points (71.7% liked)

Anarchism

2314 readers
2 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Funny aside, ziq hates me :D

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'll rather die before I eat my veggies!

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You made an irreverent joke, they respond with an irreverent joke, you respond with a flat insult.

Fucking why??? Is this me not understanding people or is this fucking bizarre?

[–] PaX@hexbear.net 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm genuinely asking, whether it's normal or bizarre this confuses me.

People often confuse the shit outta me.

[–] PaX@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think a lot of Hexbears are just kinda upset and mad at them for all the shit-stirring in the last few days. I don't really blame them.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean the way I see it, there was one initial incident of shitstirring, and it's just been escalating leftist infighting since then. It wasn't even originally made by db0, or in reference to hexbear specifically (but them sharing it was really the shitstirring incident).

To be blunt it seems like the magnitude of the hexbear response seems to have more to do with them being federated and given tacit permission to keep commenting about it here than anything else. There is a lot worse going on elsewhere that hexbear users don't invest this much energy in because it is less convenient to do so.

None of that really helps me understand this attitude/behavior that seems like whiplash between humor and hatred.

[–] PaX@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well, as far as I'm aware it started with that awful "tankie" meme posted by db0 that portrayed MLs/MLMs as inhuman monsters rolling out the firing squads at the earlier opportunity. That thread blew up when our users saw it on our feeds and voiced their opinions with it. Since then, there's been a few more threads posted by db0 and they keep blowing up cuz it's usually something our users take offense to (like posting this essay by ziq, famous terminally-online "anti-civ anarchist"/ecofascist). I have only seen one thread by our users about db0 but that came after a few days of db0 posting threads like this intentionally calling out MLs or "tankies" in a bad-faith and provocative manner.

To be blunt it seems like the magnitude of the hexbear response seems to have more to do with them being federated and given tacit permission to keep commenting about it here than anything else. There is a lot worse going on elsewhere that hexbear users don't invest this much energy in because it is less convenient to do so.

Well, we are aware of places like lemmy.world with much worse politics. These threads just keep coming up in our feeds that we can reply to with our usual accounts. Db0 is free to ban us all or add a rule saying MLs can't comment in this community but that does sound a lot like "forcible suppression of opposition" lol.

None of that really helps me understand this attitude/behavior that seems like whiplash between humor and hatred.

If it helps, that's just kinda what Hexbear's site culture is like lol. People are very passionate about politics here and can get upset about people behaving in a manner like db0. That being said, I have seen a lot of constructive and calm conversations between our users and other instances' users about politics even when we disagree.

[–] Stoneykins@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess site culture is an answer I can accept, if not have understanding of.

I can understand wanting to handle conflict with irreverence and humor. I can also understand being angry and hating each other. Behaving in both of those ways consecutively with very little transition is hard for me to understand.

[–] vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Can you stop calling names? Rise above. We can establish a good conversation.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago

I think we, the various people of both instances, can have a good conversation. OP on the other hand has spent the last several days proving himself incapable.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry, good conversation is sealioning

[–] vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

lol you are accusing me of doing that hahehahahahaha

dude. if there is someone more marxist leninist than me I would love to met that person.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm merely commenting on it being a thought terminating-cliche. Anyway, don't kid yourself about being an ML from your leftcom circlejerk.

[–] vasco@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 years ago

from your leftcom circlejerk

can't you just write normal? I have no idea what those terms are.

[–] Kuori@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago

people tried that on the last two threads. OP has no interest in conversing, so now they get insults

[–] flipht@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

You can definitely do that