this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
241 points (82.5% liked)

Anarchism

2342 readers
29 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.


Other anarchist comms


Join the matrix room for some real-time discussion.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/8181688

undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 years ago (7 children)

What an impressive turn out. Looks like they're all using the exact same "arguments" (a combination of manipulation techniques and logical fallicies) that they use every single time.

It's worrying how much of a presence these people create in online discourse because they come out in full force, dominating and suppressing anyone or thing that challenges them. There is no healthy debate.

But i suppose it all makes perfect sense; these people glorify the state, single party rule and dictatorship. Their behavior is a logical result of these beliefs

[–] FakeNewsForDogs@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago

This comment sounds like it was written by the official AI of liberalism.

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 36 points 2 years ago (1 children)

okay

you've taken your shit on the table, you can leave now

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yo, it's one thing to have fun with me, it's another to attack everyone else here. Behave yourself, ya shitstain.

[–] Catradora_Stalinism@hexbear.net 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

oh no the brave CIAnarchist is protecting his fake leftist buddies, whatever will I, the evil tankie villain, do against this?

If he didn't want a clapback he shouldn't have walked in and given his shit take

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

please relax, this is embarrassing behavior cmon

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 years ago
[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 30 points 2 years ago

What is the appropriate way to object? It seems like asking them to substantiate checks notes literally anything about what they claim is being pretty open, it certainly is different from making a conscious effort to just harass them off the platform.

But no matter what we did, it would be "a logical result of these beliefs" that in some way is incriminating and demonstrates how evil we are, any behavior except perhaps capitulating. Your psychoanalysis, like that of Freud, is an unfalsifiable, post-hoc myth-making that impedes rather than enables causal understanding of what is going on.

And all for these shitty little West Wing monologues about how the real authoritarianism is making a rude comment on a forum.

[–] Ho_Chi_Chungus@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago

the exact same "arguments" (a combination of manipulation techniques and logical fallicies)

are you going to name any of these "arguments" or are you just going to decry any person that disagrees with you as illogical and hysteric?

[–] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 17 points 2 years ago

There is no healthy debate.

Is this because every attempt at "healthy debate" with OP ends with them shitting their pants and crying "I don't owwwwwwwwwwwe you a debate"?

Nah, it's the damn tankies!

[–] combat_brandonism@hexbear.net 16 points 2 years ago

cry harder. or disable downvotes on your instance, that also works

[–] BigBlackCockroach@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

We need to connect, which then leaves us open to cointelpro. The problem of cointelpro has not been resolved, questioning our capabilities to organize ourselves.

We need a code of honor that makes cointelpro tactics a waste of time.