this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
174 points (98.3% liked)

Astronomy

5492 readers
2 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

258 by 258 mile (415 by 416 kilometer) orbit.

๐Ÿง

[โ€“] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the two numbers are perigee and apogee distance. (Closest orbital point and furthest orbital point)

[โ€“] TauZero@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The joke is that the orbit was clearly originally reported in kilometers, but the article editor "helpfully" converted it to miles and reported it in miles as default, but it makes no sense now because the same "miles" number now equals two different "kilometers" numbers.

[โ€“] BossDj@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Hah I didn't notice

[โ€“] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think that means it's nearly geostationary but instead going in a 415ish km circle above the same spot on earth? Idk.

[โ€“] NaibofTabr 5 points 2 years ago

Geostationary orbit is at about 35k km, the ISS is at about 400 km, so its definitely not geostationary.

[โ€“] lemming741@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The ISS hauls ass across the sky, a full orbit about every hour and a half.

My only understanding is those two distances are the latitude/longitude and the height. Basically imagine it corkscrewing around the earth.