This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
♦ ♦ ♦
RULES
❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.
❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.
❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.
❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.
❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.
❻ Don't be a dick.
Please also abide by the instance rules.
♦ ♦ ♦
Can't get enough? Visit my blog.
♦ ♦ ♦
Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.
$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.
It's barely been a month since the NLRB said it's illegal to do what Starbucks did again today:
11/6/23: Starbucks increases US hourly wages and adds other benefits for non-union workers
[Original link]
9/30/23: NLRB judge: Starbucks violated labor law in offering pay raises, benefits to nonunion workers
[Original link]
If the circumstances are the same, I would expect the consequences to be the same.
Is Starbucks required to change the compensation of non-union employees only during times of bargaining with their union employees?
If the company is again adding to the compensation package for non-union staff as method to discourage the unionization efforts of the non-union staff, then they should be rightfully punished.
I will buy you a cup of coffee, anywhere but Starbucks. :)