this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10258 readers
732 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The RCMP has rejected 86 per cent of the allegations it’s reviewed so far against a controversial unit created to police resource protests in the Fairy Creek watershed in British Columbia, an analysis by CBC’s The Fifth Estate has found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blindsight@beehaw.org 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The highlighted story is rather telling, too, with power tools cutting metal right next to her neck without any PPE.

Granted, the protestor locked herself with the bike lock around her neck deliberately, presumably to make arresting her more difficult, but the police still have a duty to reasonably protect citizens.

I can't really imagine a situation where it would warrant rushing that arrest and putting the protestor at risk... Maybe if it was blocking a road for an ambulance and someone was going to die if they didn't get to the hospital in time?

But this is a logging road in the middle of nowhere, so my charitable reading is that it was just too inconvenient to take a few minutes to get some protection in place. More likely, it was just a casual disregard for her humanity and they didn't care about risking serious harm.

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

The less charitable part of me thinks that it was intentional to send a message that putting yourself in a riskier situation is just going to increase the chance you get harmed because the police are going to take the exact same actions. A way to deter people attempting it again in the future.

Or it could be that this was becoming so commonplace to the police that they had disassociated the risk of harm from the action they took over and over again.

In any case, some retraining and possible rotation is obviously needed.