this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
1800 points (99.9% liked)

196

18339 readers
324 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cabunach@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (8 children)

It's always masked as an "assault on truth" tho inn'it?

Regarding everything you listed? No.

Your comment is both a gross misrepresentation of US history and a simplification of a complex contested topic across the world.

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Why don't you provide a counterargument instead of whining. The truth is fascists need an out group to maintain power. That outgroup is always picked from some type of marginalized group. The issue is republicans are running out of those out-groups more and more, but the strategy is virtually the same. If you go back in time and analyze the rhetoric it's virtually identical.

[–] Cabunach@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

The fact that you're equalizing US Republicans with fascists speaks magnitude of how shallow and undeveloped your position is.

And that's coming from me as a European, with absolutely no vested interest in US internal affairs.

[–] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

The fact that you've blustered twice without providing any actual points whatsoever speaks magnitudes of how shallow and undeveloped your position is.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)