this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Futurology

3188 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Universal healthcare is a thing. The US is possibly the only first world exception. I live in Norway, and pay a maximum of $250 a year on medical expenses. Everything else gets covered by the govt.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm aware. However, things like this feel like it would be considered beauty care which generally is not considered to be applicable for universal healthcare.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Age-related symptoms and diseases are the biggest burden on healthcare infrastructure. Anything that reduces said impact would definitely fall under healthcare.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, but history this doesn't support that belief. Unfortunately

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Given the history of medical research, we certainly owe Norway rats one.