this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
44 points (97.8% liked)

Futurology

3188 readers
6 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Awesome, so does this mean all the rich old dudes ruining everything for everyone else get to continue to do so for longer? You just know something like this would be prohibitively expensive to the general populace. Really exciting.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 5 points 2 years ago

As long my as they’re rats, yes

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Move out of the states and it'll be affordable

[–] vind@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] wahming@monyet.cc 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Universal healthcare is a thing. The US is possibly the only first world exception. I live in Norway, and pay a maximum of $250 a year on medical expenses. Everything else gets covered by the govt.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm aware. However, things like this feel like it would be considered beauty care which generally is not considered to be applicable for universal healthcare.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Age-related symptoms and diseases are the biggest burden on healthcare infrastructure. Anything that reduces said impact would definitely fall under healthcare.

[–] vind@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yes, but history this doesn't support that belief. Unfortunately

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Given the history of medical research, we certainly owe Norway rats one.