this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Understdy-evrything@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Dude, you can absolutely be optimistic about the trade (I personally am not). But to call it a “major steal” is maybe the wildest thing I’ve seen on here today.

[–] BuffaloBrain884@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yea we're giving up a pick around #35th overall for him, not a steal at all. That's a high price to pay.

[–] TheMetabrandMan@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who else can we get that’s of his calibre at pick #35?

[–] BuffaloBrain884@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

We could have drafted someone at #35 and also signed a DE in the offseason. We didn't have to give up the pick.

It was too high of a price to pay. SF gave up a pick around #70 to get Young. That's good value. #35 is an overpay for a player like Sweat who is very good but not elite.

[–] padflash_@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Not a steal, but for a guy who is first round talent at a premium position and this allows us to focus our other two first round picks on two other premium positions, I think the Bears did pretty well.

load more comments (3 replies)