this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
130 points (90.1% liked)

News

37090 readers
2226 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I get it, mental institutions are responsible for some of the most egregious human rights violations of the 20th century.

But that's an argument to REFORM those institutions, not ELIMINATE them.

We should learn from the lessons of the past and, at the same time, make sure people get the mental health care they need.

If they can be successfully treated and released? Fantastic. If they need to be held for the rest of their lives? It's better than allowing them to roam the streets posing a danger to themselves and others.

We see it in Portland ALL THE TIME.

https://www.kgw.com/article/news/crime/portland-psychiatric-facility-unity-center-behavioral-health-lawsuit-attack/283-81de7a64-3a80-4b3d-8968-53b10f9a1d95

https://www.koin.com/local/washington-county/tigard-police-patient-assaults-ambulance-crew-on-mental-health-call/

https://katu.com/news/local/hatchet-attack-in-portland-a-sign-of-a-bigger-problem-mental-health-advocate-says

[–] SoupyHappenstance@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I like where your head is at but I doubt Donald thinks that way. He's not really a reform person.

[–] Kedly@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

I've worked in both Community Living Housing and one of the Last Institutions in Canada (Which I recently learned has closed as well). And I got FAR more training and resources to do my job at the Institution, and the residents had far more supports and programming. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, we need to reopen institutions, and just have better systems in place to prevent abuse

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Okay. I agree.

Now tell me with a straight face you think Orange Face is looking to help these people instead of just removing them from view.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, definitely not, but that's not a reason to not try. :) It's a reason to invest and make it actually work.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Oh for sure. I'm just not going to be surprised when these and the safe camp sites for the homeless turn into concentration camps.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

He's looking for a future home, me thinks.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: Mentally ill people have the same rights as everyone else and therefore can't be locked up without a criminal conviction, no matter how annoying their symptoms may be.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Then we need a national version of the Baker act to commit them for their own welfare. Just because they haven't harmed anyone else (yet) doesn't mean allowing them to roam loose isn't actively harming them themselves.

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How about before we look into finding ways of permanently locking away mentally ill or neurodivergent people, who are already relegated as second class citizens, we find ways of shifting our civic budgetary concerns away from bloated PD coffers and into mental health and advocacy programs instead?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why not both?

Here in Portland we're fed up with the mentally ill self medicating on meth and fentanyl, waving axes and machetes at people.

I wish I was exaggerating.

They shouldn't have to victimize the general public before we do something.

https://www.koin.com/news/oregon/the-connection-between-portlands-recent-crimes-and-possible-mental-illness/

[–] mriormro@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, no thanks. The moment you lock away groups of people "for their own good" is the moment the majority of the voting public dehumanizes them and only ever perpetuates an 'out of sight, out of mind' mentality in regards to policy.

There is a real storm coming across all of the world in regards to our collective mental health crisis and we're doing a very good job of ignoring it or thinking that reactionary policy that historically has shown to be terrible on most accounts is the best way to confront it.

This is going to play out much the same way as our climate crisis unless we start truly examining, at a policy level, why our contemporary institutions are failing us collectively.