this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Apple

111 readers
1 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hamhead@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I just want them to “innovate” their way into supporting an actual number of monitors that makes sense.

[–] Put_It_All_On_Blck@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Even Intel's cheapest CPUs have IGPs that support 3 external monitors at 4k, you just need to make sure it has the ports to do it (like 1x thunderbolt 4 + 1x HDMI or Display port).

Like you can get <$500 PC laptops that do 3 external displays. Apple has no excuse beyond segmentation, forcing people to buy a more expensive 'Pro' CPU.

[–] jimbo831@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Only Apple has the courage to sell you a "Pro" laptop for $1600 that doesn't support more than one external display!

[–] KagakuNinja@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Not everyone uses 2+ monitors, and then you would be demanding 4/8K at 120hz. These chips require making trade-offs.

My personal laptop is used stand-alone, for work I'm a caveman with a single monitor. If you need multiple monitors, then don't buy the base MBP.

[–] Fun_Description6544@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

They do it to „upsell“ you towards M3 Pro. There is no other reason why a powerful chip like M3 should not support 2, 3 or even 4 external displays.

[–] ThePegasi@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Whilst this is definitely true, wouldn't the absence of necessary I/O hardware also cut costs on the chip?

[–] Fun_Description6544@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Yes, they can cut costs on the chip and the I/O hardware if I remember correctly. Anyways, these costs are minimal compared to the enormous overall prices of these machines. It just seems like a silly idea to cut costs in an area where even 500$ Windows laptops offer a good functionality.

[–] Slitted@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

It’s also because the base M1/2/3 chips find their way to the iPad lineup as well, where there’s already limited use for even 1 external display.

[–] NihlusKryik@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Its a hardware limitation, so you are essentially claiming that Apple, at the design phase, explicitly scoped a limitation of external displays?

[–] Alternative_Log3012@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Facts

(There’s actually a good technical reason as to why this is the case, to an extent, but the answer ultimately comes down to the fact Apple is being cheap)

[–] kyo20@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

What’s the technical rationale? Is it related to heat and efficiency?

[–] mellenger@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

The video ram would be the issue with the 8gb ram version I bet.