this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)
Data Hoarder
221 readers
1 users here now
We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have a large and growing DVD and Blu-ray collection.
That's the stuff I have physically that could take "less space" if I were to rip them and put them onto a massive HDD NAS.
Why don't I do that?
I also have many other collections that I maintain and need to add to or remove stuff from. Such as the camera collection, the watch collection, the books, the retro games, the retro computers, the Wedgewood pottery (yes I'm serious), the Lladro and Nao pottery figurines and other antiques that caught my eye.
I'm also a guy who has multiple hobbies since I turned 10 in 1990. I have skills in programming on retro systems I'm looking to re-awaken. I have been an avid photographer that shoots both film and digital to this day, and that hobby is screaming at me as my extensive 35mm and 120 film negatives I have made since the early 90's are totally unprotected as they have not been scanned and indexed yet! That is exacerbated by the fact I'm still enjoying shooting new film and so adding to the pile.
Oh and that's another example right there, of what I have physically that would take up "less space" digitally: my negatives. Well even when I finally scan them all I'm still keeping the negatives. The scanning is only to allow me to archive them digitally to Blu-ray and have another copy in Amazon Glacier in case the negatives all burn in the house. If they don't burn in the house, like the dvd/Blu-ray/CD collection, they will out last me considering that silver halide film is one of the most stable storage methods there is.
So yeah why? Well no time. Just simply no time. The film is waaaaay more important to digitise rather than an out of print audio CD. So I'll happily keep adding to the stack of CD's 🤣