this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
158 points (98.8% liked)

Ukraine

10496 readers
398 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Granite@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They can’t have too many of these left

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

30 down and 192 to go according to Wikipedia (which doesn't include today's one)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_Russian_military_aircraft

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I assume they need some minimum number to fortify the rest of the border, so I wonder what amount they can actually lose before theor border readiness degrades.

[–] Hopfgeist@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Unless there is an actual offensive going on, these are not really needed. They are attack aircraft (short-range air-to-ground missiles and rockets, small bombs and cannons, etc.), not interceptors or aerial combat fighters. Their air-to-air capability is largely non-existent, and strictly defensive. Russia may use some in Syria, but Ukraine would be their main theatre at the moment.