this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
36 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
KenBonesWildRide@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
itsPina@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net
36
So, the Democrats overwhelmingly voted to remove Kevin McCarthy, a man who had no political sauce... (hexbear.net)
submitted 2 years ago by NewLeaf@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Which allowed the GOP controlled house to elect a much more fashy religious zealot who will be waaaaay worse for the country?

Am I missing something here? How is this not the biggest "own goal" they have pulled in recent memory? Now we get to listen to endless whining by liberal media outlets about how evil the new anti-daddy of the week is?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NewLeaf@hexbear.net 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah, but isn't their whole thing "harm reduction"? If you have a feckless enemy, wouldn't it make more sense to leave them in place instead of rolling the dice on the next fascist?

[–] Deadend@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

They only care about harm reduction when it’s a statement.

But there is no reason for the Dems to ever say Yes to any Republican rep.