this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
658 points (84.6% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
658
eat the rich (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by ThunderChunk@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 

It's a meme

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

"Seize the means of production" is a communist's rallying cry because they know that they can't build anything on their own

[–] Maven@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who do you think built the means of production in the first place? I've never seen a rich guy in a suit laying down bricks all day to build a factory.

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Yeah, a group effort, lol

The laborers planned and built the stuff, and the owners took the profits. Good job team!

[–] Maven@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Capital and labor, both are intertwined and cannot exist without the other

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sure, but labor consists of the de facto responsible actions of persons while capital is a dead tool. When thinking about assigning legal responsibility for the positive and negative results of an action, we only look at the de facto responsible party and lay the legal responsibility for the whole result on them. For example, if a crime is committed with a gun, the gun isn't held liable. Inanimate objects conduct responsibility back to the persons using them and cannot be responsible

[–] jlou@mastodon.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

On the part of labor. No matter how causally efficacious capital is. It can never be de facto responsible for anything because responsibility is imputed through the tools back to the workers using them.

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The workers built the means, they just never owned them.

Let me guess, you think Steve Jobs made the iPhone because he pulled it out of his pocket on a stage and took the credit of engineers standing on the shoulders of publically funded basic research? Steve jobs couldn't engineer his way out of a wet paper bag, and that is well documented.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Remember when bill gates bought dos and used his moms connections to sell it IBM?

Remember when apple was given their entire gui by xerox?

Remember when xerox exects threw what would be the modern "PC" in the trash because they are only good at collecting money and wouldn't know revolutionary technology if their own R&D made it?

[–] Zoboomafoo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think Steve Jobs made the iphone by coordinating and funding a team of engineers to develop and produce the phone, then marketed it using his own name for brand recognition.

He could not have done it without those engineers and workers, and they would not have made the phone without Jobs.