Every one of them were called “terrorists” or something equivalent at some point. Now think about who’s on the opposite of this list. Apartied South Africa, slavers, settlers, Zionists, the US government… There is only one moral and just side to be on and it’s not even a discussion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ScrewdriverFactoryFactoryProvider@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They repeatedly offered to release him from jail in exchange for denouncing socialism. He did no such thing. He also reached a point where he refused to condemn violent rebellion because the non-violence wasn’t getting the goods. What liberals unknowingly worship him for, in their civility fetishism, is his acts of public reconciliation with the colonizers. Would have been good to get that post-apartheid wealth redistribution instead but what’s done is done.

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

The lesson is, and always will be, to get the goods first.