this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
189 points (99.5% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They'll claim it, but it's actually still easy to determine if an image is AI generated with minimal effort.

Legitimate images will have a source and knowing the source will allow you to validate things like meta data and location/time the image was taken.

AI is really only useful for entirely synthetic images.

[–] Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Average people don't care. Otherwise, Fox News would not exist.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago

That's a bit of a misanthropic viewpoint. Sure people will believe what they want, but AI images aren't going to convince anyone who wasn't already convinced, and they definitely will never serve as anything more than very temporary smokescreens that instantly betray the legitimacy of whoever uses them.