this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
849 points (96.6% liked)

Programmer Humor

25699 readers
1261 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] reflex@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (11 children)

Like the other guy, I also read your comment twice looking for mistakes but found none.
You should of left something to fix!
๐Ÿ˜

Edit: I'm glad there so many people who are as passionate about the correct spelling of "should've" as I am. I was testing you all, and you passed!

[โ€“] ironhydroxide@partizle.com 13 points 2 years ago (10 children)

Correcting the reviewer.
Notes: "should of" isn't valid, should implies a verb, of isn't a verb. I expect you meant "should have". Please recall this in future submissions.

[โ€“] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They should of course keep that in mind, but it's not that "should" should always be followed by a verb directly. The problem is that "of" in this context is a mishearing/spelling of "have", so they should in this case have written it like that instead.

[โ€“] jadero@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

I would argue that "should of" is just a naive written rendition of the spoken contraction "should've". They are homophones, so it's a completely understandable error among those without the relevant education or background. I know only English and was in Grade 9 at a different school before someone corrected me.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)