32
This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
(www.technologyreview.com)
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
32 points (79.6% liked)
Digital Art
8144 readers
3 users here now
Community rules:
-
Be respectful and considerate in comments.
-
No deliberately offensive or inappropriate content.
-
Traditional artists and posts are also welcome here.
-
All posts must properly credit the original artist.
-
Please use the tickbox to mark any NSFW content.
-
No A.I. generated dreamscapes for now, as those are at best unethically sourced in the current state.
-
No furry or anthro related art.
How to post:
Please follow the convention of the images already uploaded so far i.e.:
Image title by Artists Name
In the description link the source to the image, and also include a direct link to the artists gallery. See previous posts for examples.
What to post:
You can post your own work here, but avoid spamming.
You can post your favourite peices here for us all to enjoy.
--
All artworks are copyright of the artists named in the posts.
Artists gallery links may contain NSFW works.
--
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
If this takes off, it will be illegal within a year.
There'll be a new Digital Sabotage Act, written "with input from industry leaders" and voted on without debate or enough time to read the bill.
If this takes off, it will be bypassed within a month. Adversarial training is something Stable Diffusion users already invented, and we use it to make our artwork better by poisoning the dataset to teach the network what a wrong result looks like. They reinvented our wheel.
It's fine, as outside of laboratory conditions it won't work anyways (diverse image "reverse labels" would erase their signal to noise ratio of biased pixels across aggregate real world training data), so no need to stress about any kind of reaction to it.
Wouldn't surprise me