this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
18 points (61.0% liked)

World News

49045 readers
1854 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TheIntercept.com

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I'm not worried about the International Criminal Court. The ICC isn't The Intercept, so the ICC doesn't twist words or invent quotes to fit anti-American prejudices. The ICC judges people by what they actually said, and it's clear that Biden didn't say what you wish he said.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My wishes are immaterial. The lawyers have made their case to the world. Find their emails and tell them what you told me. I would say good luck, but to be honest, I don’t think your argument is strong.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You're dreaming. There are no lawyers on this case. There isn't even a case.

After all, the Dutch Prime Minister has expressed the same views as Biden. If holding that opinion was a war crime, The Hague could arrest Mark Rutte within 45 minutes.

[–] livus@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

@FlowVoid of course you're not worried. The US doesn't recognise the ICC, and would not submit to its judgement.

I don't really get why you are arguing with @TokenBoomer about what Biden did or didn't say, though. One person's words are not really what this warning is about. It's about the actions taken by the US government and military under the Biden administration:

Under international law, the crime of genocide implicates not only those carrying out the crime, but also those complicit in it, including by “aiding and abetting.”

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't worry about US actions even if they did recognize the ICC.

"Aid and abet" has a specific legal definition. It means doing something in the hopes that a crime will succeed, or encouraging someone to commit a crime.

So for instance, if you sold your car to someone who used it to rob a bank then you wouldn't necessarily have aided and abetted the robbery. A prosecutor would have to prove that you sold the car because you wanted the buyer to use it in a bank robbery.

I think it's pretty clear, by word and action, that the US does not want to see a genocide in Gaza. To the extent that they are providing support to Israel, they are actively encouraging Israel to use it only for legal activities, i.e. destroying Hamas, not killing civilians unnecessarily.

[–] livus@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Thanks, that's a clear viewpoint.

I can see your point. I think time will tell, but the lawyers would probably right to give them a warning even if you turn out to be correct.

Genocide is comprised of thousands of actions. The US has many people involved on the one hand - and also a very efficient, secretive surveillance network on the other, so if they do provide material support to genocidaires there would be inevitable questions about who knew what when etc.

All moot because of the American Servicemembers' Protection Act (aka Hague Invasion Act) of course.