this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
21 points (95.7% liked)

MTG

2261 readers
25 users here now

Magic: the Gathering discussion

General discussion, questions, and media related to Magic: the Gathering that doesn't fit within a more specific community. Our equivalent of /r/magicTCG!

Type [[Card name]] in your posts and comments and CardBot will reply with a link to the card! More info here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] astanix@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Too many confusing choices. I agree that consolidation into one regular pack and one premium pack is a good move.

I do not like less commons, more uncommons. Especially while keeping 3 uncommon slots.

[–] mike@mtgzone.com 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I also agree that consolidating from 4 to 2 packs is a good move. One comment in the Youtube video was interesting though, and they mentioned that increasing the number of uncommons will make an already difficult task in collecting every uncommon even more difficult. It will also have a more profound impact on draft than I think people are aware of but that we obviously have to wait and see.

[–] astanix@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Draft will be interesting with multiple rares and good uncommons. I'm looking forward to it.

[–] SteveHeist@mastodon.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago

@mike @astanix I dunno that having more uncommons versus commons will really affect draft *that* much. Rarity is arbitrary and 21 "commons" getting upshifted doesn't change that much?